European Union leaders failed to reach agreement on Friday on a new seven-year budget for their troubled bloc, calling off talks in less than two days after most countries rejected deeper spending cuts demanded by Britain
and its allies.
European Council President Herman Van Rompuy decided to end a summit on the 2014-2020 EU budget, worth about 1 trillion euros, and try again early next year rather than continue negotiating into the weekend, sources in six
“It’s over,” one EU official involved in the talks told Reuters. He said leaders were working on a statement saying when they will return to negotiations and what caused the impasse.
Another diplomat said Van Rompuy and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso would be mandated to try to close the gap between member states before a future budget summit. Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, the biggest contributor to EU coffers, had been skeptical from the outset that leaders would reach the unanimity needed for a deal at the first attempt and played down the consequences of
“I have always said that it wouldn’t be dramatic if today were only the first step,” she told reporters. “I think the positions are still far apart and if we need a second round we will take the time to do it.”
In 2005, the last time the EU held its marathon budget negotiations, it took six months and an acrimonious failed summit at which Britain wielded its veto before a deal was finally found. There was no such drama on Friday. But EU officials warned that failure would divert time and resources away from efforts to shore up the faltering euro zone, and reinforce the impression among citizens and investors that EU leaders suffer from collective indecision.
It could also delay the programming of hundreds of billions of euros in investments in transport and energy projects in poorer ex-communist eastern members of the 27-nation bloc, meant to help them catch up economically with the richer west.
British Prime Minister David Cameron said a compromise plan tabled by Van Rompuy that scaled back cuts in farm subsidies and regional aid to placate France and Poland was insufficient, given the austerity member states were implementing at home.
“It isn’t a time for tinkering,” he told reporters as he arrived for the second day of talks. “There hasn’t been the progress in cutting back proposals for additional spending.”
Germany, Britain, Sweden and the Netherlands, all net budget contributors, were pushing for further cuts of between 30-75 billion euros on top of the 80 billion already trimmed from the European Commission’s original spending blueprint.
Cameron, playing to Eurosceptical images of Brussels “fat cats”, targeted the roughly 60 billion euros earmarked for EU salaries and benefits in 2014-20 for deep cuts, insisting that European officials endure similar reductions in numbers and pay as national officials in some countries.
He handed Van Rompuy a paper setting out ways to trim the bloc’s administration bill by 10 percent, including raising the retirement age for most officials from 63 to 68, and capping pensions at 60 percent of final salary instead of 70 percent.
“These are not dramatic changes,” a British official said of the proposals. “The Commission and others are telling the Greeks, Italians and others that they should put the retirement age up to 68.” Van Rompuy ignored them in his latest draft compromise plan.
Negotiations on the EU’s long-term budgets are always rancorous affairs, but the depth of Europe’s present debt crisis has made the inevitable arguments over farm subsidies and rebates all the more bitter. With national budgets being cut across much of the bloc, EU officials are having to contemplate the first ever real terms decline in future spending.
More than two-thirds of the EU’s roughly 130 billion euro annual spending is paid out in subsidies to farmers and investment in new motorways, bridges and other public works in poorer southern and eastern European countries. The current seven-year budget worth 1.034 trillion euros in EU financial commitments for the period 2007-2013 was agreed in 2005, at the height of a credit-fuelled boom in public spending.
The Commission initially demanded a roughly 5 percent increase in spending for 2014-2020, equal to 1.091 trillion euros. But this has already been reduced to 1.01 trillion euros under Van Rompuy’s compromise, and many net budget contributors insist the total must dip below the trillion euro mark.
Previous deals have been built around Franco-German pacts to defend generous EU farm subsidies against attack from Britain and other northern states. France receives more from the Common Agricultural Policy than any other country, while Germany is also a major beneficiary.
But the need for overall budget restraint now appears to be a higher priority for Germany than safeguarding farm spending, prompting France to ally itself with Poland and former-communist eastern European states to jointly oppose cuts to the two biggest areas of EU spending.
French President Francois Hollande pressed for proposed cuts in farm subsidies to be restored. One area where Britain stod alone was in its bid to protect its cherished budget rebate from any cuts. The annual refund worth 3.5 billion euros last year was first won by Margaret Thatcher in 1984, to reflect the lower share of
farm subsidies received by Britain.
Paris, Berlin and others want to reform the complex system of rebates that also sees linked payments made to Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. But EU officials accept that Cameron cannot win the support of Britain’s
euro-skeptic parliament for any deal that scraps the rebate.
Since You Are Here, Support Good Journalism
CrossRiverWatch was founded on the ideals of deploying tech tools to report in an ethical manner, news, views and analysis with a narrative that ensures transparency in governance, a good society and an accountable democracy.
Everyone appreciates good journalism but it costs a lot of money. Nonetheless, it cannot be sacrificed on the altar of news commercialisation.
Consider making a modest contribution to support CrossRiverWatch's journalism of credibility and integrity in order to ensure that all have continuous free access to our noble endeavor.