Every year, thousands of Nigerian graduates leave their homes and families to participate in the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) program. For many young graduates, the program represents an opportunity to contribute to national development, gain professional experience and interact with people from different ethnic, religious and cultural backgrounds.
Established in 1973 after the Nigerian Civil War, the NYSC scheme was designed to promote national unity, encourage mutual understanding and foster a spirit of patriotism among Nigerian youths. Over the years, the program has become an important part of Nigeria’s educational and national development system.
However, beneath these noble objectives lies a serious concern that deserves the attention of the government, NYSC management and the general public: the safety of corps members throughout their service year.
From travelling long distances to unfamiliar states to facing security threats, medical emergencies and challenging living conditions, corps members may encounter circumstances that put their wellbeing at risk.
The recent reported death of Etimbuk Daniel, a corps member and former Students’ Union Government President of Akwa Ibom State University, at an NYSC orientation camp in Enugu State has brought renewed attention to the importance of corps members’ safety.
Reports indicate that Daniel complained of a headache, received medication at the camp clinic and subsequently experienced a worsening condition. National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) raised allegations concerning the medication he received and a reported delay in transferring him to a hospital. These allegations require a thorough investigation to establish the facts surrounding his death.
The incident raises an important question: are the existing policies and procedures of the NYSC scheme adequate to protect the lives and welfare of the young graduates entrusted to its care?
Although the program was established to promote national unity and development, these objectives must be pursued alongside effective measures to protect participants.
The Nigerian government should undertake a comprehensive review of the NYSC scheme, particularly its policies on deployment, security, healthcare, orientation camps and general welfare, to determine whether they remain suitable for present-day Nigeria.
Reviewing the NYSC scheme does not necessarily mean abolishing it. Rather, it means examining its existing policies, identifying weaknesses and determining what changes are necessary to protect corps members more effectively.
Nigeria continues to face security challenges in some parts of the country, including kidnapping, armed attacks, communal violence, road accidents, and other tragedies that have plaqued the scheme over the years. These threats make it necessary to examine the procedures used to deploy graduates to different states and communities.
Many corps members are posted to places they have never visited before. They may be unfamiliar with the local environment, transportation systems, security situation and available emergency services.
For some, the journey to their states of deployment involves travelling across several states, sometimes over long distances. Without reliable information about their destinations and travel routes, they may find it difficult to make informed decisions about their safety.
These circumstances raise important questions about whether adequate security assessments are conducted before deployment and whether corps members receive sufficient support when conditions become dangerous.
The NYSC should regularly assess the security situation in deployment locations and work with relevant security agencies to identify potential threats.
Where credible information indicates that a location presents a serious danger, the authorities should consider alternative postings or other appropriate protective measures.
National service should encourage young people to contribute to their country, but it should not require them to ignore reasonable concerns about their personal safety.
Daniel’s death is a painful loss to his family, friends, former university colleagues and the wider student community. It also raises serious questions about the medical procedures used to care for corps members who become ill during orientation.
How are medicines obtained and checked at camp clinics? What happens when a corps member’s condition deteriorates after receiving initial treatment? Who has the authority to approve an emergency transfer to a hospital? How quickly can that transfer be arranged? These are important questions that deserve clear answers.
Just a few weeks ago, rumors broke out that the NYSC suspended deployment of corps members to Cross River State due to its deplorable and unhygienic orientation camp in Obubra Local Government Area of the state. While the decision forced the state government to relocate the orientation camp temporarily to University of Entrepreneurship, Akamkpa, to give room for major renovation, it calls for serious concern.
The deployment of corps members to states outside their states of origin is one of the major features of the NYSC program. The policy is intended to promote national integration by allowing graduates to experience different cultures and interact with people from other parts of Nigeria.
Although this objective remains important, the government should examine whether the existing deployment policy adequately considers the security and welfare of corps members.
A policy designed to promote national unity should also respond to changes in the country’s security environment.
The review should investigate how deployment decisions are made, whether security information is considered before postings are issued and what procedures are available when a corps member is assigned to a location that later becomes unsafe.
It should also examine the process for requesting redeployment on genuine medical or security grounds.
Corps members who raise credible safety concerns should have access to a transparent process through which their situations can be assessed fairly and promptly.
The government should consider whether deployment procedures can be improved through more frequent security assessments, better communication and closer cooperation with relevant authorities.
The purpose should not necessarily be to abandon cross-state deployment, but to ensure that national integration is pursued alongside reasonable safeguards for corps members.
The financial circumstances of corps members also deserve attention during a review of the scheme.
Many graduates begin their service year without stable employment or substantial savings. They may depend on their monthly allowance to pay for food, transportation, accommodation, communication and other basic needs.
When the cost of living rises, the adequacy of that allowance becomes an important welfare concern.
Financial difficulties can also affect safety. A corps member who cannot afford reliable transportation or reasonably secure accommodation may face additional challenges while travelling or settling into a new environment.
The government should therefore examine whether existing allowance policies remain appropriate in light of prevailing economic conditions.
The review should assess the adequacy and timeliness of payments, the financial responsibilities corps members face and whether additional welfare measures are necessary.
This does not mean that financial difficulties alone determine whether the scheme is effective. However, the program should periodically evaluate whether its support arrangements are reasonable for the conditions in which corps members are expected to serve.
Any changes should be based on reliable economic information and the resources available to the government.
The broader objective should be to ensure that corps members can participate meaningfully in national service without facing avoidable financial hardship that undermines their welfare.
Corps members are deployed to various organizations, including schools, hospitals, government establishments and private organisations.
These placements can provide valuable professional experience and allow graduates to contribute to their host communities.
However, the government should review the working conditions corps members encounter during their assignments.
The review should examine whether host organizations provide safe working environments, reasonable supervision and clear descriptions of corps members’ responsibilities.
It should also assess whether placements make appropriate use of graduates’ qualifications and skills.
A graduate’s service year should provide opportunities for meaningful contribution and professional development rather than simply filling staffing gaps without adequate supervision.
Corps members should have clear procedures for reporting unsafe working conditions, harassment, intimidation and other serious workplace concerns.
The government should also assess how NYSC officials monitor host organizations and whether existing complaint procedures are effective.
Where weaknesses are identified, the authorities should consider clearer standards for organizations that receive corps members and stronger mechanisms for addressing violations.
The review should ensure that corps members’ contributions are recognized while their rights and welfare are reasonably protected.
A review of the NYSC scheme should also examine the responsibilities of officials who manage the program at national, state and local levels.
Effective policies are important, but their success depends on how consistently they are implemented.
The government should assess how officials respond to reports of security threats, medical emergencies, poor accommodation and other welfare concerns.
It should also determine whether existing procedures provide adequate opportunities for corps members to report problems and receive timely assistance.
In cases involving serious injury or death, the circumstances should be investigated carefully to determine what happened and whether existing policies were followed.
The reported death of Etimbuk Daniel demonstrates the importance of obtaining clear answers when questions arise about medical treatment and emergency response at an orientation camp.
An investigation should establish the sequence of events, examine relevant medical records, verify the medication administered and determine whether the emergency procedures were followed. It should also establish whether any failures occurred and what steps could prevent similar incidents.
Such an investigation should be fair and evidence-based. It should neither assume wrongdoing before the facts are established nor dismiss legitimate concerns raised by the family or student community.
Where negligence or misconduct is established, appropriate disciplinary or legal measures should follow. Similarly, the review should also consider if NYSC officials require additional training, retraining and resources.
Only healthy and safe corps members can save their fatherland.
Faith Odezulu is a 300-level student of the Department of Mass Communication, University of Cross River State (UNICROSS) and currently undergoing her mandatory Industrial Training program with CrossRiverWatch.
Note: opinion expressed in this article is strictly attributed to the author Faith Odezulu and does not represent the opinion of CrossRiverWatch or any other organization the author works for/with.
Short Link:
Leave feedback about this